Museum
Friends of Durham Mining Museum
Events Calendar
Join our Friends!
Newsletter Contents
e-Books and Books for sale
Photograph Gallery
Document Archive
Master Name Index
Discussion Forums
What's new in the site

Mining History
Colliery Index
Colliery Maps
Company Overviews
Who's Who
Mineral Information
Managers Certificates
Educational Material
Bibliography
Statistics
Workers/Employee Lists
Notes for Family Historians

Disaster Reports
Names of those killed
Disasters in the 1700s
Disasters in the 1800s
Disasters in the 1900s
Memorials
Awards for Gallantry

Links to other sites of interest
Industrial Heritage Days Out

View our Guestbook

Index to site

Contact and address details

  Disasters - Names Disasters - Names  
Date:  4th May 1900
Colliery:  South Elswick
Cause:  Irruption of water
Lives Lost:  2

Description

No. 190. — This accident occurred at South Elswick Colliery, Newcastle-on-Tyne, on the 4th May, and resulted in the loss of two lives, the bodies not being recovered until the 1st June and the 3rd June respectively.

It was known to the management that a large accumulation of water existed in the workings marked B, on accompanying plan, but as will be seen from a reference to said plan, there was apparently a considerable intervening barrier of solid coal.

This solid barrier gave to the manager a feeling of security, but, notwithstanding, he took the precaution to stop the workings proceeding in the direction of the water, when still 45 yards distant according to the measurements on the plan.

Preparations were being made to turn off to the north when the water broke through at the point C where the presence of old workings was quite unsuspected.

There were about 30 men in the district affected, when the inrush occurred, but all of them got safely out with the exception of the two men, Thos. Watson and Robert Hankinson.

Both of them had left their working places, and accompanied the other men part of the way in the race for life against the water. They were, however, unfortunately unable to escape.

The evidence at the inquest demonstrated that all the requirements of the Coal Mines Regulations Acts had been observed, and the jury expressed the opinion that no blame was attributable to the management.

The following report is from the "Newcastle Daily Chronicle" of June 15 :—

ELSWICK COLLIERY FATALITY.

INQUEST RESUMED.

Mr. J. R. D. Lynn, coroner for South Northumberland, resumed the adjourned inquest as to the deaths of Thomas Watson and Robt. Hankinson, two miners, who met their deaths by an inrush of water at the South Elswick Colliery, on 4th May last. H.M. Inspector of Mines (Mr. J. L. Hedley) was present.

Robt. Simpson Anderson, manager of the colliery, produced the plan of the workings of the Stevenson district of the colliery, in which the accident occurred.

William Thompson, a coal hewer, stated that he was beside Watson at the time of the accident, which occurred in the Beaumont Seam at 5.30 a.m. They heard a noise, and witness going to see what was the matter met a rush of water. They then went away together, and as soon as they reached the water, which was up to their knees, their lamps went out. They continued on along the roadway until the water reached the roof. Witness then made a rush for it, and diving under the water, came out at the flat, where he could stand up with the water up to his waist. So far as he was aware, Watson had not followed. At the time of the inrush the deceased was hewing coal, witness being at his place for the loan of his drilling gear. On reaching the flat, he went on until he reached the deputy, George Dunbar, and reported to him where he had left Watson. Witness knew that the way they were working they were approaching a district where there was water. There was water that morning in the headway, which he had never noticed before.

By the Inspector: He had not reported his discovery to any official because he had not an opportunity. He did not think there was any danger. It was only his second day in that particular district.

James Watson, brother of deceased, gave evidence. Witness was in the back-shift, deceased in the fore-shift. They both worked in the same place. He knew, and so did the deceased, that they were working from a watery district. The accumulated water was at a higher level than they were working, there being a difference of about 18 feet. He noticed the water going into his place. He had a suspicion of danger, and before his brother went to work he gave him warning. Deceased seemed to ridicule the idea. Witness also informed Mr. Hall the under-manager, that water was coming down where they were working. Along with Mr. Hall, the overman was in Watson's place during his shift, and they saw the water. He offered to go in and get the gear out but his brother said he would go down and work a shift. About a month previous to the accident he was working at the west or higher side of the flat, but did not then think that he was so near the old workings. He did not know where the water came from, but suspected, as did every man of the colliery, that it came from the old workings.

William Tennent stated that on 4th May he was working in the next place to Robt. Hankinson. On the morning of that day, between 6 and 6.30, he heard a noise. Witness stopped working, and when a coal hewer called to him he went from the bottom of the bord to the back headway. He never saw Hankinson. With two men he faced the water all the way, and in the back headway the water was about a foot off the roof. They thought Hankinson was just behind, but when they got to a place of safety they missed him. He was satisfied then that deceased had not got through. There were no signs of water in the bord that he was in. Hankinson had apparently not known the road.

James Crawford stated that he heard a report as of a shot being fired. He went on to the back headway and saw the water. They all faced the water, witness leading the way. They had one lamp amongst them. They never missed Hankinson until they reached safety. Deceased must either have taken the wrong turn or fallen.

George Dunbar stated that he found the body of Watson on 1st June. He was lying in the fifth north headway. There were no marks about the body. He was also present when the body of Hankinson was found on the 3rd of June. The body was floating. He was the deputy in charge of the district where the accident occurred. He visited the places of both the deceased men between two and four o'clock on the morning of the accident. There were no signs of any extra water. On 1st May three places were stopped in the ordinary course of working. On 3rd May there was a little water coming from the side, but not of sufficient importance to warn the men of any danger. He could not say where the water came in. He was never given any special instructions as to water, nor had he received any report as to its accumulation.

From the "Newcastle Chronicle" of 6th July

INQUEST AND VERDICT.

The inquest into the causes of the death of Robt. Hankinson and Thos. Watson, who lost their lives in South Elswick Colliery was resumed and concluded at Benwell yesterday afternoon.

The evidence showed that the inrush of water, which led to the death of the men, came from workings which were unknown.

It was agreed that the sudden inrush of water on 4th May caused the men's death, and the jury were unanimously of opinion that there was not the slighest reflection upon the management.

Source: 1900 Mines Inspectors Report (Cd 536), Newcastle District (No. 3) by J. L. Hedley, H.M. Inspector of Mines, copy held in the Scottish Mining Museum, Newtongrange, Midlothian.

Fatalities

  

Hankinson, Robert, aged 35, Hewer, the two deceased men were hewing in the Beaumont Seam, when a holing was unexpectedly made into some old workings containing an accumulation of water; no one had any knowledge of the old workings [Inspection made & inquest attended]

  

Watson, Thomas, aged 31, Hewer, the two deceased men were hewing in the Beaumont Seam, when a holing was unexpectedly made into some old workings containing an accumulation of water; no one had any knowledge of the old workings [Inspection made & inquest attended]

 
All names found

Newspaper Articles

05 May 1900  Colliery Flooded (The Times)
15 Jun 1900  Elswick Colliery Fatality, Inquest Resumed (Newcastle Daily Chronicle)
06 Jul 1900  Inquest and Verdict (Newcastle Chronicle)

 

Return Return   Return Return to Top


Mail:
Webmaster

Back

Home
Crown copyright material is reproduced under Class Licence Number C01W0000177
with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland.
Copyright © 1999-2008 by The Durham Mining Museum and its contributors
Registered Charity No: 1110608
Page last updated: 01 Jan 2008


Search

Print