Museum
Friends of Durham Mining Museum
Events Calendar
e-Books and Books for sale
Photograph Gallery
Document Archive
Main Document Archive
Newspaper Articles
Articles by date
Articles by colliery
Personal name index
Local Record Extracts
D.M.A. Document Archive
Transactions of I.M.E.
Miners' Welfare
The Colliery Engineer
Mine & Quarry Engineering
Mining Journal
Coke and Gas
Master Name Index
Discussion Forums
What's new in the site

Mining History
Colliery Index
Colliery Maps
Company Overviews
Who's Who
Mineral Information
Managers Certificates
Educational Material
Bibliography
Statistics
Workers/Employee Lists
Notes for Family Historians

Disaster Reports
Names of those killed
Disasters in the 1700s
Disasters in the 1800s
Disasters in the 1900s
Memorials
Awards for Gallantry

Links to other sites of interest
Industrial Heritage Days Out
Former www.pitwork.net site

View our Guestbook

Index to site

Contact and address details


 Newspaper Articles Newspaper Articles 
The Times
22nd November 1919

Colliery Profits

Coalowners' Protest Against Limiting Bill

A meeting of the Executive Council of the Mining Association of Great Britain, representative of the coalowning interest in England, Scotland, and Wales, was held at the Midland Grand Hotel yesterday to protest against the Government's proposed Bill for the limitation of coalowners' profits. The meeting was presided over by Mr. Evan Williams (president of the South Wales Coalowners' Association), and was addressed by Lord Gainford, Sir Adam Nimmo, Sir Frank Beauchamp, Mr. Parker Rhodes, and other coalowners. The following resolution was passed :—

"This meeting of the Mining Association of Great Britain, representing the coalowners of England, Scotland, and Wales, records its emphatic protest against the proposal of the Government to promote a Bill in Parliament to limit colliery profits to an average of 1s. 2d. per ton on the coal raised, and expresses its settled conviction that any Parliamentary interference in the direction of limiting the earnings of any section of those engaged in an industry, whether owners or workmen, is not only economically unsound, but disastrous to that encouragement of initiative, energy, and enterprise essential to the success of industrial undertakings and would undoubtedly prevent the flow of the necessary capital into any industry crippled by such pernicious legislative enactments."

Mr. Wallace Thorneycroft, chairman of the Coal Association, in conversation with a representative of The Times last night, said :— "We hold that Mr. Bonar Law was no more pledged to the limitation of owners' profits to 1s. 2d. a ton than he was to nationalization. The coalowners assume that profits will be classified in proportion to pre-war profits, adjusted to the several outputs. Round about 50 per cent. of their pre-war profits will, we estimate, be taken away from the coalowners under this Bill. During the war we agreed with the Government that our profits should be limited. That agreement was confirmed by the Coal Mines Control Agreement (Confirmation) Act of 1918, and it is still in force. The agreement limited coalowners to the pre-war standard of profit, plus 5 per cent., if it were earned. Profit remaining above the 5 per cent. excess went in the proportion of 15 per cent. to the Controller and 80 per cent. to the Treasury. The standard period was taken as any two out of three pre-war years, or any four out of six.

"The point, however, is that while by other industries 20 per cent. of profits was retained and 80 per cent. handed to the Treasury, the coal industry was able to keep only 5 per cent. The position is now that the Bill will reduce the standard of gross profit to the mineowners by a half, and that will depend upon their maintaining their ‘standard' output at its maximum. In these circumstances there can be no question of any ‘excess' profits."

 


Mail:
Webmaster

Back

Home
Copyright © 1999-2008 by The Durham Mining Museum and its contributors
Registered Charity No: 1110608
Page last updated: 01 Jan 2008


Search

Print