Museum
Friends of Durham Mining Museum
Events Calendar
e-Books and Books for sale
Photograph Gallery
Document Archive
Main Document Archive
Newspaper Articles
Articles by date
Articles by colliery
Personal name index
Local Record Extracts
D.M.A. Document Archive
Transactions of I.M.E.
Miners' Welfare
The Colliery Engineer
Mine & Quarry Engineering
Mining Journal
Coke and Gas
Master Name Index
Discussion Forums
What's new in the site

Mining History
Colliery Index
Colliery Maps
Company Overviews
Who's Who
Mineral Information
Managers Certificates
Educational Material
Bibliography
Statistics
Workers/Employee Lists
Notes for Family Historians

Disaster Reports
Names of those killed
Disasters in the 1700s
Disasters in the 1800s
Disasters in the 1900s
Memorials
Awards for Gallantry

Links to other sites of interest
Industrial Heritage Days Out
Former www.pitwork.net site

View our Guestbook

Index to site

Contact and address details


 Newspaper Articles Newspaper Articles 
The Times
19th November 1910

The Whitehaven Pit Disaster

The official inquiry into the Whitehaven pit disaster was resumed yesterday at Whitehaven, Before Mr. Atter, Coroner, and Mr. Redmayne, Chief Inspector of Mines.

Thomas Graham, overman, stated that when, six hours before the explosion, he inspected the two brakes in No. 3 north he found all clear of gas and nothing to indicate that anything was wrong.

Questioned as to where the explosion originated, the witness advanced an opinion that the mischief arose at the far end of No. 2 brake, in No. 3 north, but what caused it he had no idea. Examined by Mr. Rigby Swift, representing the owners, the witness said that his reason for not suggesting to the under-manager at 5 o'clock on the evening of May 12 his plan for getting at the men by the main back dip, was that he knew that whatever he said would have had no effect.

Mr. Swift. — The success of your plan depended upon your being able to put a stopping across the main engine plane on the far side of the fire at a point which, circumstances have since shown, must have been within eight or ten yards of the fire ? — Oh, no. If it had been too hot there we could have gone further down on the south back dip.

The fire was so hot and smoke so dense in the main intake that you could not get nearer than the fan-site ? — Yes.

You proposed to go down to exactly the same fire, only on the other side ? — Yes.

Do you know that the fire was so hot as to melt the solid iron wheels and solder them to the steel cable at the friction gear ? Could you pass within 20 yards of a fire like that ? — It was not so fierce when I wanted to go down.

Can you suggest a practical scheme ; we say that nothing could be done after Henry, the under-manager, met Wear and Kenmore ? — I say it could by my scheme.

You know that Wear and Kenmore passed the fire at 10 minutes past 10, and a few minutes later it was too hot for them to come back ; I suggest that you could never have walked past it ? — I could have gone another way (pointing to some old workings on the plan).

By Mr. Redmayne. — If they could have got past the friction gear 30 minutes would have sufficed to get the men out.

Mr. Redmayne. — It would have been a policy of desperation.

The inquiry was again adjourned.

 


Mail:
Webmaster

Back

Home
Copyright © 1999-2008 by The Durham Mining Museum and its contributors
Registered Charity No: 1110608
Page last updated: 01 Jan 2008


Search

Print